Discussion 2: Translational Research Graphic Organizer
April 6th, 2022
Translational Research Graphic Organizer
Use the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template” to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template
| <Type Translational Research Type Here> | <Type Traditional (Qualitative or Quantitative) Research Type Here> | Observations (Similarities/Differences) | |
| Methodology | |||
| Goals | |||
| Data Collection |
© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
© 2013. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Rubic_Print_Format
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |||||
| NUR-550 | NUR-550-O102 | Translational Research Graphic Organizer | 100.0 | |||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory (88.00%) | Good (92.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Translational Research Graphic Organizer | 100.0% | |||||||
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is present. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details. | ||
| Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | ||
| Presentation | 10.0% | The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | ||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | ||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | ||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
